On Legco Election Day last September, I travelled from Fanling to Yuen Long to help with campaigning.  Before that I was having lunch at a McDonald’s and started chatting with an auntie named Ching sharing the table with me. Auntie Ching and I exchanged phone numbers and thereafter she sent me Whatsapp messages once every few weeks asking me when I will be back to Yuen Long to see her.  Hence last Saturday I decided to invite Auntie Ching to the Waste-No-Mallevent located in Yuen Long town centre.   

Waste-No-Mall, is a weekend market event which combines recycling, free-cycle, surplus food distribution and eco-workshop. It takes place every Saturday from 4 to 6 p.m. in Yuen Long on Fung Yau Street North next to the public playground and is operated by the campaign team of LegCo member Chu Hoi Dick.  I was well prepared for the free-cycle.  I brought along with me a leather belt which I haven’t worn for years, a pair of shoes which I brought from Oxfam store but a size too small and a book which I had finished reading.  After putting down my items for others to pick up, I showed Auntie Ching around.  Before our meeting, Auntie Ching had just spent 200 bucks shopping for clothes.  Hence she found it unbelievable that everything displayed at the free-cycle is literally FREE.   Only after explanation by a passionate volunteer mending the booth that Auntie Ching finally gathered enough courage to pick up a bottle of past-best-by-date body lotion and a glass jug.  I got myself a brand new eyewear cleaning cloth and a white board eraser.

After our treasure hunt, I went to the clothing rack and chatted with the volunteer mending the rack.  Two young women walked past and were contemplating what it was about.  The volunteer seized the chance to explain how free-cycle works and the reasoning behind.  While they were very supportive of the idea of sharing stuff as well as kindness, and said they would bring their clothes for sharing in the coming weeks, they were frank enough to tell us that they were on their way to shop for new clothes.  It will probably be a long conversion process starting from dropping off pre-owned clothes to becoming part of the minimalist/ green movement.  A good start anyway…

Different from conventional politicians, Chu Hoi Dick has no interest in empty talks.  He has vision about the future of Hong Kong, and he is good at implementation and execution.  Thanks to all the great works done by his team of volunteers, this makeshift Waste-no-mall is taking place every Saturday from 4 to 6 p.m. next to a playground.  What a contrast to the  Eastern Community Green Station, which receives over 10 million HK dollars public funding from the HKSAR government and occupies thousands of square feet of usable space underneath the Eastern Corridor in Sai Wan Ho but only holding free-cycle event once every three months. 

Edited by Iris Leung

Pledging not to buy new clothing this season

It’s late November, and the cool weather has finally arrived in Hong Kong.  I have committed myself to Jup Yeah‘s (Jup Yeah means “pick up stuff” in Cantonese) campaign by pledging not to buy new clothing this season.  As proclaimed by its website: know your style, change your consumption habits, and pick up pre-loved clothing instead of shopping for new clothes.

In order to boost its sales volume, fashion brands, especially fast-fashion brands, have moved at a dizzying speed, creating trend after trend. These apparel chains spend huge amounts of money in advertisement and celebrity endorsements, creating an illusion that everyone has to follow the newest fashion trends. Once you are taken in by this illusion, you are made to believe your old clothing is deemed ‘unwearable’ and so you had to shop for new clothes, and discard your old clothes. By doing so not only are you filling up the clothing donation bin outside your building, you are also filling up the bank account of these fast fashion tycoons. No wonder so many of them ranked in the top 100 richest people in the world.

In addition to further enriching the already filthy-rich, fast-fashion is also causing great harm to the environment.  Clothing which consumes a lot of energy and causes a huge amount of pollution to produce is being sold as almost disposable items. In an attempt to wake Hong Kongers up from this illusion, one weekend in early November, Jup Yeah brought hundreds of pieces of pre-owned clothing to Causeway Bay on a bicycle cart and handed them away to people who have made the pledge not to purchase new clothing for a season.

In case you’ve missed out the above event, no worries, you can still go shopping at pre-owned clothing social-eco enterprise Green Ladies. I visited the new location at Tai Kok Chui on Lai Chi Kok Road ( 10 minutes walk from Prince Edward MTR station) two weeks ago. The store has simple design, with slogans on the wall saying “Women empowerment. Try before you buy” and the clothes are arranged according to colours. Every piece of clothing comes with a tag informing customers with facts stating the impact on fashion. For example, “In China, the garment manufacturing industry emits 2.37 tonnes of waste water every year, which ranks no. 3 amongst all industries. ” All these details demonstrate the values behind Green Ladies’ commitment to provide middle-aged women employment opportunities and encourage eco-friendly consumption habits, and at the same time, raise awareness and educate consumers on the hidden environmental impact of the garment industry, which I deeply share.

On my way back to Prince Edward MTR station, I walked in the Salvation Army thrift store.  In contrast to the quietness and meticulousness of Green Ladies, Salvation Army thrift store is a place for a treasure hunt.  During my visit I found a pre-owned cotton+ linen dress for HKD 55.  By the way, holder of senior citizen cards can enjoy 15% discount.


Edited by Iris Leung

撲水! Water for Free!



The idea for “Water for Free” originated three years ago in an effort to reduce environmental damage caused by plastic bottles. With no financial resources, our initial plan was to map out the water fountains and dispensers throughout Hong Kong on google map and publish it onto our wordpress website. Luckily, Nuthon IT Solutions Limited volunteered to develop the iPhone mobile phone app and WYNG Foundation volunteered to develop the Android mobile phone app for Water for Free. By downloading the app, one can easily locate a water fountain or dispenser nearby and drink “water for free” rather than paying for outrageously overpriced bottled water, and in turn reduces the number of plastic bottles entering our landfills and ocean every day.

Thanks to a growing number of users and their efforts in notifying Water for Free of new water dispenser locations, we have mapped out over 1000 water dispenser locations on our Water for Free app. In the past year, a number of fast food chains (including McDonalds, Cafe de Coral, Maxim MX and Yoshinoya) have installed water dispensers at their newly renovated branches. Although their reason for doing so has nothing to do with environmental concerns (patrons use these self-serve water dispenser instead of asking their staff for water, hence lowers labour cost), installing water dispensers at such convenient locations has brought unintentional benefits of reducing the need for bottled water as it has become more convenient for people to refill their reusable water bottles. In addition to the unintentional good deed by the fast food industry, recently we have been contacted by an independent restaurants, coffee shops and community centres – they welcomed everyone to come to their premise and use their water dispensers for free. Salute to their generosity and love for the environment.

In order to step up our effort to SAY NO TO BOTTLED WATER, we stepped out of the virtual world. On 25 September 2016, we installed three water dispensers in the West Kowloon Culture Zone to provide Water for Free to all participants of the Pink Dot HK event. Thanks to the event organizer’s love and support for the environment, we recorded over 3000 participants drinking water or refilling water bottles from the three water dispensers during the 5 hour event. Without these water dispensers, participants would be forced to buy bottled water widely available from the vending machines which are PERMENANTLY placed in the West Kowloon Zone. In other words, the presence of our water dispensers there has successfully averted the consumption of 3000 plus bottled water, and eliminated the 3000 plus plastic bottles that would inevitably end up in the landfill or into the ocean. At the same time, we encouraged participants drinking from our water dispensers to download our Water for Free mobile phone app, which can help them locate nearby water fountains and dispensers around Hong Kong and make a conscientious effort to abandon the bad habit of buying bottled water.

According to the 2014 Waste Statistics issued by the Environmental Protection Department (EPD), Hong Kong produces 132 tons of PET plastic waste daily. Each bottle weighs about 25 grams. This means that we throw away over 5 million PET bottles per day. Instead of responsibly addressing the waste issue caused by their products, beverage companies spend huge amounts on advertising designed to convince us to buy ever more of their products. The fact that their products are filling up our landfills and killing wildlife – birds, fish and sea turtles eat broken pieces of plastic mistaking it for food – is not their problem. It is ours. So we are asking for your help to do your part for the environment, please use a reusable beverage bottles.

To download the app, please click here

Translated and edited by Iris Leung


Real Environmental & Social Responsibility at Bijas


Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) is the term used by many corporations and the HKEX to describe what was previously known as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Despite the change in name, its primary function is still public relations. ESG/CSR departments hold events such as beach cleanups, environmental forums, student sustainability challenges, visits to elderly homes, collecting “lai see” packets for re-use and so forth. The primary purpose of all of this is to fluff up ESG reports with nice photos and meaningless numbers such as “4,000 man hours – An aggregate of 4,000 man hours was devoted by all our participants and supporters to solving the environmental challenges together.” What was actually achieved during these 4000 hours it does not say.

Why do most companies not engage in meaningful ways to improve their environmental and social impact? Core operations remain untouched because real improvements are difficult or costly to implement, usually both. The business case for these investments simply do not show an acceptable return on investment. This is where independently-owned companies (that do not have to generate excess profits to pay for exorbitant executive pay packages, massive advertising campaigns, and flocks of accountants and middle managers) can outperform larger companies.

By supporting independently-owned companies that operate sustainably, we as consumers can slowly re-shape the commercial landscape to reflect our values. F&B is one of the a largest industries in Hong Kong and has very large environmental impact. Bijas is an independently-owned restaurant that is leading the way in environmental and social responsibility. Here are some examples how:

  • The chairs in Bijas had been discarded by a nearby high school. Bijas collected and refurbished them. In an escalating war to attract students, the casualties include thousands of chairs that are needlessly thrown out by schools every year. If they are not thrown into the landfill directly, they will be broken down by scrap dealers. The time, effort and cost of refurbishing them makes it much more attractive to simply buy new.
  • The light fixture is upcycled from 600 plastic bottles.  Designed by an artist and made by students, it looks like designer piece from an upscale European furniture store. By engaging students and creating locally, we strengthen our communities.
  • “Pay by weight” means we only take what we need (soup and rice are unlimited). The effect is good for the environment and good for our health. Because food itself constitutes a relatively small portion of the cost of a meal, ever increasing portion sizes has become part of the marketing of restaurant chains.
  • To reduce waste entering our landfill, kitchen waste is collected and sent to the campus composting machine to be turned into compost. Kitchen waste constitutes 30% of total landfill waste. It has an outsize impact on climate change because organic matter decomposes anaerobically in a landfill. This produces methane, a greenhouse gas many times more potent than CO2.
  • Bijas is a vegetarian restaurant. Meat production is one of the single largest emitters of greenhouse gases. Soya, wheat and corn are fed to chickens, pigs and cows. These crops are produced in monoculture fields with massive inputs of chemical fertilisers and pesticides. The animals are then raised in industrial meat factories, where they are fed antibiotics (60% of all antibiotics produced globally is fed to livestock) to prevent them from getting sick in overcrowded conditions.
  • The restaurant supports the HKU Rooftop Farm by hosting monthly meals made with vegetables grown by the students. Creating a farm-to-table experiences enriches students environmental awareness and learning.
  • Bijas hires hearing-impaired, elderly and mentally challenged staff while still maintaining a seamless customer experience. The teamwork and customer service is beyond what I’ve experienced in many many other F&B outlets. Integrating this diverse range of human capital is no easy task. But Bijas demonstrates that it can be done while at the same time creating a terrific customer experience and serving high quality food. Successfully done, this does reaps rewards in terms of employee loyalty and reduced turnover.

As consumers, we can use our purchasing power to support enterprises that have social and environmental sustainability at the core of their operations. Where we spend our hard earned dollars matters and can make a difference in our society by helping environmentally responsible enterprise grow, thereby sending signals to market that this matters to consumers.

And if I forgot to mention it earlier, the food at Bijas is delicious.

Shopping for Second Hand Furniture


It’s been eight years since we bought any new furniture. Relocating back to Hong Kong in a hurry, we resorted to the easiest way to set up a household by going to the largest furniture chain store on earth – Ikea – to buy a mattress, a set of pinewood chairs and dining table and a toy-like fabric sofa.  Since then, we have switched to the following greener methods to furnish our home:

1. Ask relatives and friends if they happen to be getting rid of items we need

We are living in an era of too much stuff.  As long as you are willing to ask, you will realise that there are always people that you know who are trying to get rid of furniture, electrical appliances and other household items. The above mentioned toy-like sofa we purchased soon fell apart, so I asked on Facebook to see if any friends had a unwanted second-hand sofa.  A friend responded almost immediately. She was moving to a furnished apartment and so could give me the sofa from her spare room. The sofa, which happened to be a very useful sofa bed, had hardly been used was like new. It cost over HK$6000 to purchase new.  We have been using it ever since.

2. Browsing second-hand stuff websites

If I can’t get what I am looking for from friends and family, I will then go to Asiaxpat.  A few years ago, I needed a dehumidifier.  Surprising someone was trying to sell his online. I bought it for HK$1000, which is a lot cheaper than a brand new one.  The machine lasted over 4 years. Not a bad deal at all.

3. Second-hand furniture store

Sourcing second-hand furniture online has quite a number of limitations. First, you will often have to go to multiple locations to get everything you need. This is an issue because transportation costs are not insignificant. Second, the selection is often quite limited. And finally arranging moving can be a hassle.

Recently, we went to Green Dot Home,  a second hand furniture store. We were looking for a larger dining table, some cabinets and an office chair. We found a glass dining table and a steel cabinet that met our needs and decided to pick up an clear acrylic coffee table as well – all for HK$1800. We weren’t thrilled with the selection of office chairs available so decided to pass on it. Overall, they had a terrific selection of items that included many high quality solid wood pieces. The prices were also quite reasonable – with professionals you don’t have issues with people over-estimating the value of their used goods.

They arranged to move all the items to our apartment in the new territories for HK$400. We highly recommend this shop because it really is a win-win for both the consumer and the environment. The value for money is quite high because the furniture is often of significantly better quality than what you would purchase for the same price in places like Ikea. The convenience of a one-stop shop and full service delivery and setup help to seal the deal. Its also a big win for the environment because no new resources are consumed in manufacturing items. Best of all, I enjoyed the treasure hunt and finding unique pieces I otherwise might not have considered.



Students Lead the Way to a Greener Future


As the semester winds down and summer vacation begins, university students living in halls need to empty out their room and return it to the university. Personal belongings such as clothing, stationery, kitchen ware and personal care products (shampoo, conditioner, body wash) are often simply thrown in the trash. Three years ago, a group of green-minded students from the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) took action. They spent countless hours and untold effort to sort all the stuff being thrown out, store it, and then bring it back to campus the following school year for use by incoming students. Last month, I was lucky enough to join and was able to witness first-hand the severity of the waste problem. Here’s what I saw:

1. Tonnes of (hardly worn) clothes being abandoned

It seems many young people are deeply influenced by the ubiquitous advertising campaigns mounted by fast fashion brands. A large proportion of the “waste” consisted of clothing. Not only poor quality clothing which has lost its shape after a few washes, but also many durable items such as jeans are easily discarded.

Each college, department and club holds it’s own orientation camp. The participants are provided with logo-ed T-shirts. Camp organisers are very “considerate” to the fact that participants are usually too busy to wash their T-shirt during the camp, so they provide several T-shirts to each and every participant.  While sorting out the discard clothing, I picked up 8 brand new T-shirts still in the original plastic packaging. I won’t need to buy T-shirts for quite a while.

2. Pillows, quilts and bedding are being needlessly discarded

Mattresses are provided by the halls, but students have to bring their own pillow, quilt and bedding. From what I could tell, most students were moving out with one or two large luggages. If they stuff their pillow, quilt and bedding into the luggage, there really isn’t much room for anything else. Hence, much of the bedding is simply abandoned (photo above). The head of a college, has agreed to implement a program to have these items dry-cleaned, and then re-sold to incoming students to defray the dry-cleaning cost. There are simple, effective solutions to reduce waste but many more administrators need to get on board.

3. Hangars, hangars and more hangars

There is wardrobe in the student’s room but hangers aren’t provided. Students are required to return the room completely empty.  Even the hangers can’t stay. Thousands of hangers are thus dumped into the garbage every year. A few months later, another batch of students moving in will need to buy thousands more hangers. Witnessing such needless waste really frustrated me. Why can’t halls simply make an exception for hangers? Or at least, set up a re-use corner in the laundry room where students moving out can leave their hangers, laundry baskets and laundry pegs for students who will move in the following semester (photo below). Again, there are simple, practical solutions but administrators need to be coaxed or incentivised into doing more than the bare-minimum.

This re-use initiative was started by the students green group “CU x Rubbish” three years ago. This year, the initiative has spread to all nine colleges of CUHK. We hope that the university administration will provide more concrete support and encouragement to this terrific student-led initiative. We also hope other universities in Hong Kong will take up the challenge of reducing this needless waste.



Real Environmental Leadership


In early May, the Royal Hong Kong Yacht Club (RHKYC) announced that from June 8th 2016  onwards, it will no longer sell beverages in single-use plastic bottles nor provide members with plastic bags or straws. According to its Facebook’s post, the Club’s Rear Commodore Sailing, Anthony Day said, “Reducing the amount of waste being dumped into our oceans is one of the challenges of our time. Here in Hong Kong, where recycling is effectively non-existent, it’s impossible to sail far without being struck by the amount of plastic that finds its way into our waters and onto our beaches. As one of the world’s larger and most active yacht clubs, RHKYC is then uniquely positioned to be able to show innovation and leadership in no longer using or providing plastic bags, bottles or straws. I am proud of our cadets for showing the way through their successful initiatives promoting the use of reusable water bottles over the past three editions of Hong Kong Race Week and grateful both to our management and to our membership for now taking up the ‘plastic free’ challenge with effect from World Oceans Day.”

Many premises in Hong Kong sell plastic bottled drinks.  The primary reason for this practice is convenience and costs – staff don’t need to prepare the drinks or to wash the tableware afterwards.  It is a very easy way to make money.  An even easier way is to allow the beverage company to place vending machines on the premises.  The beverage company will dispatch staff to re-stock the machines regularly.  In return for allowing the machines to be installed, the premise owner takes a cut of the sales revenue. In order to protect the marine eco-system from being further traumatised by more plastic waste, the RHKYC’s decision demonstrates real leadership in going against this tide.

REAL environmental leadership inevitably involves changes to revenue-generating or core operations and educating customers, which most companies and organisations will shy away from (don’t rock the boat). The prevalence of MBA-style thinking has taught our leaders to use cost-benefit or risk-return models to make organisational decisions. Most environmental changes will result in increased short-term risks or costs to the organisation. This is why the RHKYC leadership is real – it goes against the prevailing model to address a big-picture problem.

While the RHKYC says “no” to plastic bottled drinks, what are our “leaders” in government are saying and doing? Recently, Anthony Cheung, the Secretary for Transport and Housing, when asked by a legislative councillor why there are no water fountains installed in parks and leisure areas managed by the Housing Authority,  gave the following reply “Since the《Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines》is silent as to provision of water fountains, and since water fountain is not a standard facility in public housing estates, hence there is no plan for the Bureau to install water fountains at these locations.”  The Secretary further suggested park users either bring their own drinks or buy them from shopping arcades in the public housing estates. In contrast to the leadership and decisiveness of the RHKYC, Secretary Cheung’s bureaucratic response is really quite embarrassing.

In response to Secretary Cheung, I have the following questions: Does the《Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines》mention the provision of vending machines?  If not, why are there so many beverages vending machines placed in government premises? How much profit has the government made from sales of plastic bottled drinks from these vending machines?  Is this profit being re-invested to subsidise the recycling of plastic bottles?

Lee Tung Street ~ Then and Now


Over a decade ago, I worked in an office building on Queen’s Road East.  On the way to and from the MTR, I walked through one of those small streets connecting Queen’s Road East to Johnston Road.  Spring Garden Lane was often jammed packed with people.  So if I was in a hurry and wanted to avoid the human traffic jam there, I would walk on Lee Tung Street instead.  There were a number of wedding card design and print shops there.  In between them, there was also a custom shirt maker.  I walked into this shop one day in 2004 and had a white shirt made.  There were two gentlemen working in the shop, the middle-age man was responsible for taking measurements and helping clients select the fabric and detailing. The elderly gentleman was busy with the sewing machine at the back.

The White Shirt that Lasted a Decade

After washing and wearing the shirt for a number years, the shirt was longer white.  However, since it fits me so well, I kept wearing it.   Recently, I realised that it had started to fray near the collar.  I had to admit that my relationship with this white shirt had finally come to an end.  Luckily, the phone number on the tag was still in use by shop, which had since relocated to the nearby Luen Fat Street.  So twelve years later,  I dropped by again. The elderly tailor had passed away.  Now all the work is solely performed by the owner.  This time I had two white shirts made.


Leaving the shop on my way to the MTR, I walked past the redeveloped Lee Tung Street (see photo).  All the old “Tong Lau” have been replaced by high-end apartments selling for over HKD 30,000 per square foot.  Only a couple of the original wedding card shops were willy enough to return to the redeveloped Lee Tung Street.  The rest of the the shop lots were occupied by mid-to-high end jewellery stores, boutiques, and cake shops.  There are quite a number of young people working there.  Some as property agents, waiting anxiously for investors that dare to dive into the market at this moment.  Some are doorman, wearing velvet suits and topper hats, holding the door and greeting the residents of the “luxurious” apartment buildings.  Many are store clerks, standing idly in the empty shops waiting for the first customer of the day.

Tailor Made Shirts vs. Mass Produced Polos

Returning to Central with my shirts, I walk past the flagship store of an international clothing brand.  The one with handsome half-naked male models at the entrance greeting customers, and hot young sales staff that would randomly yell “Yo! What’s up?”  I realised that the price I had just paid for a custom shirt made in Hong Kong was not enough to even buy a mass produced polo shirt made in a third world country.

Is it not time for craftsmen that produce high quality goods to regain the respect they deserve? Is it not time to build a resilient local economy that produces quality goods rather than simply re-selling imports? Is it not time to create an environment where the next generation has the financial ability to invest in developing their skills rather than wasting away in dead end jobs? Is it not time to take the economy back from the developers and “luxury” brands?



A Students Open Letter



NOTE This open letter is re-published with permission from the environmental action group Grebbish.


Let your action match your words!

I am a university student participating in a competition called ‘Glocal Greenovation’. The competition is a corporate social responsibility event hosted by Sasa and VolTra, and it is supported by twenty-five organisations and companies, including the Environment Bureau, and Google. The competition was an unforgettable experience. I was given the chance to discuss green ideas with innovative, experienced, and friendly people from a variety of sectors. It also granted me the chance to visit the offices of KMPG, Google, and other participating corporations. Last weekend, I visited the Google Office in Hong Kong. It was a memorable experience, but it also showed me how careless catering arrangement can produce a huge amount of waste.

From the event emails, I can see that the organisers are environmentally conscious as they asked participants to bring our own cutlery, bottles, and cups; the organisers also offered rental of reusable cutlery for $20. KPMG provided the venue and a sufficient number of mugs in the first two days. The organiser served pizzas and party sandwiches, so cutlery use was cut to minimal. During dinner time, a cleaning lady of KPMG, possibly not knowing much about the event, offered to put a stack of paper cups in case all the mugs were used. After I told her that the event was promoting environmental protection, she quickly left with the paper cups. I applauded the arrangement at the end of those two days. At that time, I did not know that the arrangement would create more waste in the future.

I spent my last Saturday and Sunday from 9am to 9pm in Google Office. After the participants entered, the hype over the creative office design shifted to no less than ten pots of free Starbucks coffee over the pantry counter. I could not help but stare at the tall stacks of Starbucks paper cups that came with markers for participants to mark their names. Many people used the paper cups as the bottles they brought along were not heatproof. Was waste reduction considered during the food and drinks arrangement? I started to wonder.

The organisers ordered almost every sandwich on the menu of Oliver’s Super Sandwiches for the first meal in Google Office. The sandwiches were already packaged and participants searched for their options according to a written index. At the end, about ten sandwiches (five of which were club sandwiches) were left behind. One of my teammates microwaved her sandwich as she could not eat raw food. Some of the participants did not even eat their sandwich. These food waste can be easily avoided by setting up a simple online form for ordering on the competition’s Facebook group.

In the evening, vegetarian buffet was served and this was where the disposable cutlery frenzy started. My teammates did not bring their own boxes and cutlery as they were not needed on previous nights. No one made use of the the $20 cutlery rental service;instead, many of them used the Starbucks paper cups and coffee straws to hold their food. The rubbish filled all the bins as no cleaning was provided during the weekends.

Pots of new coffee were bought with new Starbucks paper cups in the next morning, but more participants brought heatproof cups. Then came lunch time. “Grab your lunch at pantry guys!” the voluntary helpers announced. I walked to the pantry, saw the most horrid sight — on the counter were piles of KFC boxes and bags of disposable cutlery. As I carefully put a chicken wing in my box, another personnel told me to just take the whole boxes of wings away for my group. The waste started to fill up the garbage bags.
After the final group presentations and the winners were announced, one of the voluntary helpers called for people to finish all the remaining KFC food. “You are welcome to take some food away,” said the Google representative through the microphone, “we have filled all garbage bags we have in the office.”

A group of participants started eating the leftovers away. My group members and I were taking photos, and a helper approached us, “if you want to eat, please help us eat the remaining chicken,” she pleaded. I thanked her for volunteering for the event, and found out that she was the leading voluntary helper. “I wrote the scripts for MCs and made all of the slides,” she said. I seized the opportunity and asked about the food choice. “Well, we just ordered whatever we thought of.” The topic switched as she talked to my team members.

When I was a freshman, I used to take pictures of waste left in orientation camps, because I stand firm on the principle that we need to address the issue properly no matter how ugly it could be. Having heard what the volunteer said, I decided to take my mobile phone out again to take pictures of the waste there, all the ignored yet inevitable proof all cameramen there would nimbly avoid. I decided to post my photos here and write this article because the public needs to know that this waste of earth resources can be avoided. I am writing this article because the last day of the competition will be held next Saturday in the office of Credit Suisse, and I want to make sure that the organisers of such an innovative and eye-opening competition will be careful when it comes to producing waste. I hope that while they aim to promote environmental protection, , they can match their actions with their words.